August 10, 2017
The Facts about the “Reimagine the Alamo Master Plan” Texas State General Land Office Commissioner George P. Bush has contracted with a Philadelphia, Pennsylvania-based company to develop a new image for the Alamo. This new plan titled “Reimagine The Alamo” has the full support of Commissioner Bush even to the point of him asking the Texas legislators to appropriate $175,000,000 for the new Alamo image. $100,000,000 has been appropriated to start implementing this plan. By their own admission, this plan will greatly diminish the significance of the world-famous 1836 Alamo Battle. This “Master Plan” will incorporate the following changes
This plan has the full support and approval of Texas GLO Commissioner George P. Bush. FACT! The Texas General Land Office took over management of the Alamo from the Daughters of the Republic of Texas in 2015. FACT! The General Land Office did not disclose their plans to transform the Alamo and Alamo Plaza into a glass-enclosed 21st century theme park until after seizing control. FACT! Commissioner Bush should be asked to explain why he fully endorses the Reimagine the Alamo Plan, and why a Pennsylvania-based company, instead of a Texas-based company, was selected to develop the Reimagine the Alamo Master Plan. The above FACTS were presented by Dr. George C. Skarmeas at an April 10, 2017 public hearing in San Antonio, Texas, reported by the San Antonio Express News April 11, 2017, and approved by the San Antonio City Council May 11, 2017. FACT!
John L. Hinnant
San Antonio, Texas
As Texans we are blessed by God with many treasures.
There is the land—more than 268 million square miles of it—a land rich with natural resources, abundant, life-giving waters and a wonderful diversity of wildlife. Protecting these resources for present and future generations of Texans is something that the Texas General Land Office Commissioner must regard as a sacred trust.
Equally important is the heritage of freedom with which we are blessed. Freedom won by the blood of heroes whose names still inspire us today—Travis, Crockett, Bowie, Houston, Seguin, Zavala and so many more .
The battlefields on which those Texans fought are also a sacred trust—a trust we hold not only for Texans but for all Americans. Gonzales, Goliad, and San Jacinto are as dear to freedom-loving Americans as Lexington, Saratoga, and Yorktown. And the crown jewel of our heritage of freedom is the Alamo.
Today our heritage is threatened like never before. For decades political extremists who despise Texas and all the good things Texas stands for have waged a relentless campaign of lies and vilification against men and women who risked all, and in many cases, sacrificed all so that we can live in freedom today. These far-left fanatics demand that the cultural symbols of our heritage—the flags for which brave Texans fought and died be banned, their statues and monuments be destroyed, and the very names of Texas heroes be stricken from schools, highways, parks—you name it.
Perhaps the saddest part of all is that those officials who are responsible for defending and preserving our heritage are caving in to political correctness, a polite term for the undisguised hatred of our heritage and our heritage shrines—the Alamo in particular. They want to "reimagine the Alamo." In effect they want to change the subject, to take the focus off the 1836 fight for Texas Independence, trivialize its importance, and, they hope, somehow, appease the far-left fanatics who only grow bolder when their outrageous demands are met.
This situation is specifically demonstrated by Land Commissioner George P. Bush’s misguided and incompetent stewardship of the Alamo.
Many of you are not aware of this, but current Land Commissioner Bush is foisting upon the public a plan entitled “REIMAGINE THE ALAMO” which, if enacted, will destroy the Alamo as we know it.
For one thing, the plan intends to greatly diminish the role played by the Battle itself. In the words of Bush’s Master Planner, George Skarmeas, “We cannot single out one moment in time.”
The iconic memorial to the Defenders, the Cenotaph, has stood in the middle of Alamo Plaza since Texas’s Centennial in 1936. This memorial is engraved with the names of the actual Defenders. To further their efforts to downplay the Battle, the planners (all non-Texans by the way) intend to remove the Cenotaph to a site secluded by new condominiums located several blocks away and completely off of the Alamo property.
In addition, the plan will rebuild the original plaza walls that surrounded the fort using modern-day see-through German structural glass rather than the original limestone. Instead of a hallowed battleground, the effect will be that of a Disney-style theme park. These are just a few of the major flaws contained in this scheme. There are many others.
But these are not the only troubling issues with Bush’s plan. In support of this effort, the Texas Legislature just in the last two sessions has appropriated over $100 million for its implementation. The planners project that it will end up costing an additional $350 million.
Most concerning, every penny of the money appropriated thus far, as well as its expenditure, has been totally hidden from public view by the use of nonprofit 501c3 accounts. Freedom of Information Act requests for an accounting of the money have been stonewalled to the point that it has become necessary to file appeals to the Office of the State Attorney General.
This is not open and accountable government. The Texas General Land Office, and especially the Alamo, deserve much better. Texas needs a Land Commissioner who is not ashamed of the Alamo or the heritage of freedom it represents. It needs a Land Commissioner who will treat the Alamo with the respect and dignity it deserves. It needs a Land Commissioner who will be transparent, accountable, and responsible with taxpayers’ money. It needs a Land Commissioner who will institute a plan that properly restores the Alamo while honoring its true significance and at an exponentially lower cost.
This time, Texans must not stand complacently by and allow a second tragedy to befall the Alamo. Together we can and must save the Alamo.
The following bullet points list additional detrimental elements of the REIMAGINE THE ALAMO Master Plan.
* George P Bush has already thrown out the Alamo Defenders Descendants Association, the Daughters of the Republic of Texas, and other heritage groups from having their ceremonies honoring the Defenders inside the Alamo Church. They are now having to conduct them outside literally in the street.
* Bush has already had the Church completely stripped of anything of religious or Battle significance. All of the state and national flags of the Defenders, Battle artifacts, and plaques have been removed. There is nothing but bare walls left. The interior of the Church now looks like a barren, deserted warehouse.
* The current plan includes placing a “First Amendment Area” at the Alamo in order for the far-left radicals to spout their revisionist and seditious proclamations. The current plan will place a tree-lined ditch of flowing water coursing through the middle of the Alamo Main Plaza. This feature is completely inappropriate and inaccurate, and no such feature ever existed in this location either during the mission period or at the time of the Battle.
* The plan would place the “North Wall” over 50 yards south of its correct location and thus still give visitors an inaccurate impression of the size of the original Alamo compound.
* The plan does not include rebuilding any of the Alamo Battle- or mission-era structures as has been done at most major historical sites throughout the United States—not even in locations at the Alamo where this would be possible. The necessary information and data are available to do this accurately, contrary to the claims of Bush’s planners.
* The plan envisions the construction of a four-story museum; however, all Battle artifacts would be confined to the basement. In addition, all visitors would be charged an entry fee to visit the museum.
* Under the new plan, the iconic site will no longer be referred to as the Alamo. Instead it will be known as the San Antonio de Valero mission.
A better and less costly alternative was previously offered and ignored by Texas Land Commissioner George P. Bush. View https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ykczE0kUPwY&t=149s in order to see the dramatic contrast between the two plans. * All complaints against this plan by well-respected Alamo historians, virtually all heritage groups, and multitudes of Texas citizens have been totally ignored and rebuffed by Bush and his planners. This plan was conceived with absolutely no consultation with any of the recognized Alamo experts. Thank you and please feel free to call me if I can provide any additional information that would be helpful. After the REIMAGINE THE ALAMO Master Plan came under fire, they yanked off YouTube the video of the plan as of April 2017. One of our discerning followers found it elsewhere. Here's what it would look like, as proposed, watch this.
For Dallas’ Hall of State, ‘Remember the Alamo’ means a sprawling, 2,000-piece centennial exhibit
Pennsylvania artist Thomas Feely chose to debut the work in Dallas and not at the Alamo in San Antonio.
By Michael Granberry
Dallas Morning News
10:05 AM on Mar 24, 2022
The Battle of the Alamo took place in 1836 and played a pivotal role in Texas becoming its own nation, before emerging as the 28th state in 1845. But 186 years after the battle with Mexico, the Alamo remains a source of mystery and intrigue for millions.
Not to mention controversy.
For one, when most people think of the Alamo, they think of the mission façade, which remains a major national landmark in San Antonio. The truth is, the battle and the grounds of the Alamo occupied a much larger land mass, upon which more than 2,000 people fought and about 500 died, according to Stephen Harrigan, author of the widely celebrated book, The Gates of the Alamo, published in 2000.
For those wanting to know more, the Dallas Historical Society will unveil on March 29 at the Hall of State in Fair Park a major exhibition that documents the full scope of the 13-day battle. It occupies a 14-by-24-foot canvas in the basement of the building, featuring more than 2,000 handcrafted miniatures.
“The name of this diorama is Texas Liberty Forever: The Battle of the Alamo,” says Karl Chiao, executive director of the Dallas Historical Society, which has occupied the Hall of State as a tenant since 1938.
That was two years after Fair Park and the State Fair of Texas served as the central exposition site of the Texas Centennial celebration, to which President Franklin D. Roosevelt paid a visit.
The sweeping diorama, which the Hall of State hopes will lure thousands of visitors to Fair Park, is the creation of an artist named Thomas Feely, who Chiao describes as a 75-year-old who “lives in the woods” in rural Pennsylvania.
Feely has long been drawn to the history of the battle, in which the army of Mexican Gen. Antonio López de Santa Anna reclaimed the Alamo Mission near San Antonio de Béxar, now known as San Antonio, overcoming (though not without difficulty) the greatly outnumbered Texians and Tejanos inside.
Fueled by revenge, the Texians vanquished the Mexican Army at the Battle of San Jacinto, on April 21, 1836, ending the rebellion in favor of what became the newly formed Republic of Texas — nine years before statehood.
Dallas v. San Antonio
Getting Feely and his diorama to Dallas — during a pandemic, no less — carried its own aura of mystery and intrigue, as does a question that more than a few may ask:
Why is the piece being shown in Dallas and not at the Alamo in San Antonio, where the battle took place?
That, too, is a story.
As for the artist, “He has done so many jobs,” Chiao says. “He has been a police officer. He has been a bar owner. He’s kind of a jack of all trades, but one thing he’s always loved is making little figures. Or figurines. He loves to create these little figurines.”
Feely began assembling the diorama in 2000, which means by the time it was trucked to the Hall of State, he had been working on it for more than two decades.
With the pandemic forcing the cancellation of the State Fair of Texas in 2020, Chiao and exhibits manager Toby Hazelip took a road trip to transport Feely’s Alamo from the backwoods of Pennsylvania to Fair Park.
Chiao’s curiosity had been aroused in December 2018, “when I got a call from a guy who said, ‘There’s the potential of you having this amazing thing in Dallas.’ "
That man is Rick Range, who lives in Dallas and belongs to the Alamo Society.
“I’ve got a friend named Tom Feely,” Range told Chiao. “And he has built a diorama of the Battle of the Alamo.”
Range laid out the particulars — “It is 1/54th scale. It is 14 feet by 24 feet. It has more than 2,000 hand-painted figures.” And then he said, “This was supposed to go the Alamo,” but …
“Because of issues Feely had [with Alamo management],” Range told Chiao, “he was thinking of throwing it away. I told him, ‘You can’t do that. It’s your life’s work. It might not go to San Antonio, but I know there’s a place for it somewhere in Texas.’ "
Which led to Range recommending to Feely that the next best destination would be the Hall of State. Born in Taiwan, Chiao moved to San Antonio when he was 5. Over the years, he says, he has grown weary of the folderol surrounding the Alamo.
As The Dallas Morning News put it in a March 2020 editorial: “The Battle of the Alamo ended in March 1836. Or so we thought.”
But how did Feely’s diorama become entangled in the current-day drama surrounding the Alamo?
“The Alamo has been going in a different direction,” Chiao says with a sigh. “Let’s just say it’s becoming a little more PC [politically correct].”
In other words, to focus on the battle itself is no longer as popular as it once was, amid tussles over race and historical accuracy and the so-called “reimagining” of the Alamo. And in addition to that, politics has also reared its head, with the latest flurry of what The News called “political cannon blasts” pitting one GOP stalwart against another.
That would be Texas Land Commissioner George P. Bush and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick.
Bush v. Patrick
Bush, the son of former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and the nephew of former President George W. Bush, oversees the General Land Office, which manages the operations of the Alamo. (George P. Bush will face a runoff on May 24, in an attempt to unseat incumbent state Attorney General Ken Paxton.)
Bush has been the target of criticism by Patrick and others over choices he’s made regarding the Alamo. As a headline in The Texas Tribune proclaimed in December 2019: “The latest battle of the Alamo pits Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick against Land Commissioner George P. Bush,” with a subhead adding: “The feud began when Bush was incorrectly accused of trying to erect a statue of Mexican dictator Santa Anna at the Alamo site.”
In 21st century America, the mere mention of the word “Alamo” is guaranteed to entice discussion. But as author Harrigan once said: The subject “is buried in so many layers of myth and counter-myth as to be nearly irretrievable.”
David Lozano, the executive artistic director of Dallas’ Cara Mía Theatre Co., sees the story of the Alamo as being far more complicated than popular history has portrayed it. For one, when the battle occurred, Texas — known then as Tejas — was part of Mexico.
“For Latinos, it’s a question of how we end up being portrayed in Texas history in particular,” Lozano says. “In other words, can we not jump to the conclusion that the U.S. settlers in Texas are automatically the heroes in the story? And stop portraying the Mexicans — or the Mexican government — as the automatic villains or oppressors in the story? To do so, we run the risk of making one side’s version the predominant narrative. It’s important for us to see all of the people in the story as human beings and certainly not as racialized heroes or villains.”
Chiao contends that Feely’s piece is in no way political, nor is it intended to be. Rather, it documents the battle — only. His showcase of visual art documents who fought at the Alamo and what it looked like, as though he were sent there as a photographer, traveling back in time.
This much is indisputable: Yes, there was a battle, and like any battle, it was bloody and awful.
In 1983, Feely made a 4-foot-by-6-foot diorama that, for years, occupied a niche at the Alamo. He had made it for the Daughters of the Republic of Texas, which once managed the Alamo, whose stewardship George P. Bush ended in favor of his own state agency.
After the Daughters of the Republic left the building, Chiao says, so too did Feely’s smaller diorama.
“Feely had an issue with the state over how they wanted to portray it,” says Chiao, who cites the artist’s failing health as why he won’t be coming to Dallas for the exhibition, nor will the Hall of State make him available for interviews.
Feely did reluctantly fly to Dallas in March 2019 to check out the Hall of State and meet his potential hosts. He did not want to stay in a hotel.
So, the Hall of State arranged for him to sleep in an RV parked outside.
Harrigan, whose book on the Alamo has been widely hailed by all sides, mentioned Feely in the pages of Texas Monthly in 2000 and praised his work, in particular his earlier, smaller diorama shown at the Alamo. “A spirited diorama of the final assault by Thomas Feely,” Harrigan wrote, “should not be missed.”
In 2003, Texas Monthly writer Caroline Harper added her praise:
“One of the most dramatic exhibits in this building,” Harper wrote, “is a large diorama depiction of the Battle of the Alamo, constructed by Thomas F. Feely Jr. The model is replete with exquisite detail including tiny Mexican and Texan soldiers, trees, guns, cannons, and even smoke made from cotton.”
And, of course, that diorama was merely a sneak peek of what the Hall of State will unveil.
Officials at the Alamo say they, too, are intrigued.
“We are dedicated to telling the story of the battle of 1836,” Alamo spokesman Jonathan Huhn said in a statement shared with The Dallas Morning News. “The battle was a brutal conflict where hundreds of Texans gave their lives for a single ideal — liberty.
“Mr. Feely’s diorama is a fantastic depiction of the battle. We sincerely hope that once the museum and visitors center is completed, that the Alamo will have the room available to display such large works of historical art.”
Feely’s inspiration
Artistic inspiration is, of course, paramount, so where did Feely’s come from?
“The reason he likes the Alamo is, he grew up watching Davy Crockett,” Chiao says, referring to the television series starring Fess Parker that aired on ABC from 1954 to 1955. “He loved it. And then at some point, he saw a magazine which had on its cover a diorama of the Alamo.”
And where was that diorama shown to the public? At the Hall of State in Fair Park during the 1936 Texas Centennial.
“So, he comes into our building in 2019, and he sees that diorama, and he literally starts crying,” Chiao says. “He says, ‘This is what inspired me to make mine, and yes, this would be a great home for mine.’ The whole thing was amazing.”
Chiao says Feely’s elaborate undertaking became a multi-year process of “constant tinkering. He remade it three times. He had a group of eight to 10 guys that helped him research what the final product became. They’re all members of the Alamo Society. They’re die-hards. Between the eight to 10 of these dudes, I’d say there are at least 70 to 80 years of research among them.
“If they found out there was something that wasn’t correct, Tom changed it immediately, such as the height of a building. Or if the arms of the soldiers were at the wrong angles. It’s that kind of detail. He wanted it to be perfect, and by the end, he felt that it was.”
Chiao says the finished product depicts “about 1,500″ Mexican soldiers descending on the Alamo, with “about 200 people on the Texian side,” including men, women and children. The sprawling piece also shows “horses and cattle and dogs, and yes, even a cat. A cat!”
The minuteness of detail also ended up in the faces.
“He did try to put people’s faces on them, if he knew what they looked like.” And if he didn’t, “he would put the faces of friends of his on the characters. On one of the defenders, he put John Wayne’s face on there.”
Wayne starred in the 1960 Oscar-winning movie The Alamo, in which he played Col. Davy Crockett. Wayne also directed the film.
“Another person has Fess Parker’s face,” Chiao says. “Feely left all these little Easter eggs you can find.”
Chiao expresses amazement over the complexity of detail and the deep artistic commitment Feely made to finish the project, amid a mountain of obstacles.
Those assisting him knew “what kind of cannon was on what kind of carriage. Was it a two-wheel carriage? Was it on barrels? They knew all the details about the uniforms. They even had an inventory list from the Mexican side. They knew how many battalions there were, how many sets of ladders each battalion had. So, there was a lot of research done on this piece — and on its moment in time.”
The ice storm
Against all odds, the diorama escaped the siege of ice and water that ravaged the Hall of State and other parts of Fair Park in February 2021.
So, now, Feely’s piece will become a permanent free exhibit in the South Texas Room, where, Chiao says, it will symbolize an internal triumph — the end to its own battle.
The Hall of State had been fully renovated in late 2020, at a cost of $14.41 million. But then came the record winter storm that killed 246 people and leveled a new round of damage to the 84-year-old building, leading to a second renovation, which cost just over $3 million.
Chiao says there is no better way to honor the historical society — now celebrating its 100th centennial — than for people by the thousands to come to the Hall of State to see with their own eyes Tom Feely’s masterpiece.
“After all,” he says, “the battle of the Alamo is the reason the Alamo is historic. And Tom’s exhibit is nothing less than a breathtaking illustration of it.”
Copyright © 2022 Save the Alamo - All Rights Reserved.
Contact Rick Range at [email protected]